Godly Vs. Ungodly Cartoon Sex-1
Godly Cartoon Sex Vs. Ungodly Cartoon Sex - EXPANDED AND IMPROVED
Copyright 6/23/'06; Revised 11/14/07; 5/15/08
This is a text for unedited and unchanged distribution on the net and
www as long as the author is named.
by Lee Tyler, P.O.Box 620763, San Diego,
CA 92162-0763; getting2knoya@gmail.com;
gettin2knoya@aol.com
PART ONE OF TWO
God began to reveal His moral code in the Old Testament, especially to
Moses, so we have to look at it to see what the Bible says about
cartoon sex and animated sex. It is clearly understood that Gentiles,
those who are not Jews, not descendants of Israel or or those who
covenanted with Jesus-Jehovah at Sinai - -
that such people are no longer required by Jesus-Jehovah to keep,
observe and obey the Old Testament Law. But it is clear that when Jesus
used the terms fornication, i.e. sex sin including adultery,
homosexuality, incest and all sexual relations between two people who
are not joined together by God in marriage
- - He did not change the Old Testament definition of sex sin. When the
Spirit led the Apostles in Acts 15 and 21 to declare to be free from OT
Law observance all who are not descendants of the Sinai covenanters,
Israel
and the mixed multitude, He did not change the Old Testament definition
of sex sin when He led the Apostles to declare - - -
++++?25* But concerning those of the nations who have believed, we have
written, deciding that they should observe no such thing, only to keep
themselves both from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from
things strangled, and from fornication.? Acts 21
So we who are under the New Covenant, the Law of Christ, are expected
by God to keep ourselves from what the OT Law declares to be sex sin.
While the definitions came into the Church age unchanged, the social
and legal consequences of sex sin under OT Law
did not remain unchanged. Israel today and no other country on earth
observes and/or enforces the OT Law?s social and legal consequences of
sex sin. So let?s consider how the OT Law defines the sex sin from
which we are to carefully and diligently abstain.
Lev 18:22 * And thou shalt not lie<07901> with mankind as one lieth
with a
woman: it is an abomination. 23 And thou shalt lie<07901> with no beast
to
become unclean therewith; and a woman shall not stand before a beast to
lie<07901>
down with it: it is confusion.
So any cartoon or animation that represents homosexual activity and/or
having sex with animals represents sin and is not fit for a follower of
Christ to see or think about.
Phil 4:8
A key word in this consideration is Strong's 07901 shakab {shaw-kab'}; v
Qal: to lie, lie down, lie on, to lie (of sexual relations)
The 3rd Century B.C. Jewish translators who gave us the Septuagint
rendered
"Shakab" in the Greek as "Koitayn". Koitayn is rendered by Lexigrapher
Thayer
as "cohabitation, . . . sexual intercourse." Harper's Analytical Greek
Lexicon
agrees. Lexigraphers Arndt & Gingrich go even further rendering it as
"sexual
intercourse, . . . seminal emission (Num 5:20 . . . Lev 15:16f, 32;
18:20; 22:4 . . .)." This is the Greek word used in Heb 13:4 of marital
sex in the marriage bed. To have sexual intercourse with someone is to
be communicating and/or interacting with someone by means of a sex
organ (penis, pudenda, vulva, clitoris, vagina). If a person does not
realize that there is communication and interaction when the penis of a
man touches the skin of a woman, that person doesn't know sex.
Nonverbal communication is as significant as verbal communication and
powerful and effective nonverbal communication is the penis of a man
touching the skin or mucous membrane of a woman, or the
clitoris/labia/pudenda/vulva/vagina of a woman touching the skin or
mucous membrane of a man, or the breast/nipple of a woman of a woman
touching the skin or mucous membrane of a man. Only the ignorant fail
to realize the reality of the nonverbal communication between the man
and the woman that takes place when the penis of a man is inside the
body of a woman or touches the skin of a woman.
Body fluids make one defiled or unclean under the Law. A woman who has
contact with the penis fluids of a man who is not her own man maritally
has been "defiled" sexually, and is fornication since a woman, under
the Law should be defiled by penis fluids only by her own man. See Gen
34:5,13,27; Deut 22:20-30.
From the Holy Spirit's use of <07901> above I understand the following:
1. A cartoon/animation portraying a single woman touching/doing the
genital of a man is a single woman
relating to a man by means of his genital, therefore it is <07901
shakab> behavior.
If her relating to the man by his genital (anally, orally or manually)
was
voluntary and she did not cry out for someone to rescue her from the
man's
sexual activity,it was sex sin (Deut 22:23-29; Acts 21:16-26; 1 Cor
6:9-20), the
sex sin we are told to avoid and flee from in Acts 21:25 and 2 Tim
2:22. Such cartoons and animation should be avoided by disciples of
Jesus Christ. "19 . . . I want you to do what is good and to avoid what
is evil." Rm 16 GW
2. A cartoon/animation portraying a single woman receiving penis of man
in her mouth is a single woman relating to a man by means of his
genital, therefore it is <07901 shakab> behavior. If her relating to
the man by his genital orally was voluntary and she did not cry out for
someone to rescue her from the man's sexual activity, it was sex sin
(Deut 22:23-29; Acts 21:16-26; 1 Cor 6:9-20), the sex sin we are told
to avoid and flee from in Acts 21:25 Rm 16:9 and 2 Tim 2:22. Such
cartoons and animation should be avoided by disciples of Jesus Christ.
"27 Avoid evil, do good, and live forever." GW
3. A cartoon/animation portraying a single woman receiving a penis in
her anus is a single woman relating to a man by means of his genital,
therefore it is <07901 shakab> behavior. If her relating to the man by
his genital anally was voluntary and she did not cry out for someone to
rescue her from the man's sexual activity, it was sex sin
(Deut 22:23-29; Acts 21:16-26; 1 Cor 6:9-20), the sex sin we are told
to avoid
and flee from in Acts 21:25 and 2 Tim 2:22.
Cartoons and animations that portray such sex sin should be avoided by
disciples of Jesus Christ. "3 For this is the will of God, your
sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality; 4that each one
of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor, 5not in
the passion of lust like the Gentiles who do not know God;" 1 Th 4
4. A cartoon/animation portraying a single woman letting a man touch
his penis to her skin (feet, legs, thighs, buttocks, buns, stomach,
back, hand, arm, arm pit, neck, face and/or mouth) is a single woman
relating by her skin to a man by means of his genital, therefore it is
<07901 shakab> behavior. If her relating to the man by his
genital and her skin was voluntary and she did not cry out for someone
to rescue her
from the man's sexual activity, it was sex sin (Deut 22:23-29; Acts
21:16-26; 1 Cor 6:9-20), the sex sin we are told to avoid and flee from
in Acts 21:25 and 2 Tim 2:22. Cartoons and animations that portray such
sex sin should be avoided by disciples of Jesus Christ. "22 Abstain
from every form of evil." 1 Th 5 ESV
5. If a man imagines and/or thinks about a cartoon or animation
portraying the doing any of the sex sins above with a single woman, it
is <07901 shakab> behavior, it is sex sin (Mat 5;28; Deut 22:23-29;
Acts 21:16-26; 1 Cor 6:9-20), the sex sin we are told to avoid and flee
from in Acts 21:25 and 2 Tim 2:22. Cartoons and animations that
portray such sex sin should be avoided by disciples of Jesus Christ.
"25 . . . we have sent a letter with our judgment that they should
abstain from . . . sexual immorality.? Acts 21 ESV
6. If a man imagines, thinks about or actually does touch any part of a
woman's skin other than her privates (pudenda, vagina, clitoris, vulva,
labia,
anus, breasts, nipples) with any part of his body than his penis and/or
scrotum,
it is not specifically or explicitly declared to be sin in the Bible,
as far as I know, and comes under the principles of Romans 14. So as
far as I know, it is a Romans 14 matter for a man to imagine, think
about or actually use his hands or feet to massage a single woman's
feet, legs, thighs, buns, stomach,
back, neck, hands, arms and/or face. The husband has sexual authority
over the
body of his wife (1 Cor 7:3,4), so any other man should get permission
from him
before he imagines, thinks about or actually touches those parts of
another man's woman.
7. If a woman imagines, thinks about or actually does touch any part of
a
man's skin other than his penis and/or scrotum with any part of her
body other
than her her privates (pudenda, vagina, clitoris, vulva, labia, anus,
breasts,
nipples), it is not specifically or explicitly declared to be sin in
the Bible, as far as I know, and comes under the principles of Romans
14. So as far as I know, it is a Romans 14 matter for a single woman to
imagine, think about or actually let a man use his hands/feet to
massage her feet,
legs, thighs, buns, stomach, back, neck, hands, arms and/or face. The
husband has sexual authority over the body of his wife (1 Cor 7:3,4),
so any other man should get permission form him before she lets another
man imagine, think about or actually touch those parts of hers; and she
needs to get her own man's permission before she lets another man
imagine, think about or actually touch her nonsexual parts.
8. The act of sexually stimulating oneself to to orgasm, without
physical contact with another, is no where in the Bible declared
specifically, explicitly or clearly to be sin, as long as one does not
think sexually sinful thoughts, does not think of or imagine doing sex
sin. Self-stimulation that doesn't involve thoughts of actions that are
specifically, explicitly and clearly declared to be sin by God, such
self-stimulation becomes a matter of Romans 14. As far as I know, if a
man has the doubt-free faith/belief that it is acceptable to God to
self-stimulate to orgasm while thinking about kissing, licking and/or
manually touching a single woman's feet, legs, thighs, buns, back,
stomach, neck, hands, arms and/or face - while and after having
massaged those body parts with olive oil and honey, it is a Romans 14
issue and he should have such faith/belief and/or practice privately,
discretely and secretly before God according to Romans 14:22-23.
9.> As far as I know, if a single woman has the doubt-free faith/belief
that it is acceptable to God to self-stimulate to orgasm while thinking
about a man
kissing, licking and/or manually touching her feet, legs, thighs, buns,
back, stomach,
neck, hands, arms and/or face, it is a Romans 14 issue and she should
have
such faith/belief and/or practice privately, discretely and secretly
before God according to Romans 14:22
10.> From Ezek 23 we learn more about sex sin in the following
amplified (using Strong?s Lexicon) paraphrase:
?Son of man, there were two women, daughters of one mother. 3* And they
committed SEX SIN in Egypt; they committed SEX SIN in their youth:
there were their breasts pressed, squeezed, handled, and pressed and
there were handled, pressed, squeezed the nipples of their virginity. .
. . 8* Neither left she
her SEX SINS brought from Egypt; for in her youth they had [SEXUALLY]
lain with
her, and had handled, pressed, and squeezed the breasts and nipples of
her virginity, and poured their sex sin upon her. . . 10* These laid
bare and made known her pudenda and vagina, . . . and they executed
judgment upon her. . . . . . 17* And the children of Babylon came to
her into the SEXUAL LYING DOWN of lovemaking, and their sexual
emissions defiled her with their SEX SIN; she shared her sexual
emissions with them , and her soul was alienated from them. . . 18* And
she laid bare and made known her sex sins, and laid bare and made known
her pudenda and vagina; and my soul was alienated from her, like as my
soul was alienated from her sister. . . . 20* and she evilly desired
their female lovers, whose [sexual] flesh is as the [sexual] flesh of
asses, and whose [sexual] issue is as the [sexual] issue of horses. 21
And you remembered the [sexually] loose ways of your early years, in
the handling and using of your breasts and nipples by the Egyptians,
for the [desire of your] breasts of your youth. . . . Behold, I will
raise up your lovers against you, from whom your soul is alienated, and
I will bring them against you on every side. 23 . . all of them
attractive young men, governors and rulers, great lords and renowned,
all of them riding upon horses. 24 And they shall come against you . .
. and I will put judgment before them, and they shall judge you
according to their judgments. 25 And I will set my jealousy against
you, and they shall deal furiously with you: they shall cut off your
nose and your ears, and your remnant shall fall by the sword; they
shall take your sons and your daughters; and your residue shall be
devoured by the fire. 26 They shall also strip you of your garments,
and take away your fair jewels. [Ezek 23] Cartoons and animations that
portray the sex sins described above should be avoided by disciples of
Jesus Christ. "25 . . . we have sent a letter with our judgment that
they should abstain from . . . sexual immorality.? Acts 21 ESV
11.> Couple Ezek 23 - - -
3* And they committed SEX SIN in Egypt; they committed SEX SIN in their
youth: there were their breasts pressed, squeezed, handled, and pressed
and there were handled, pressed, squeezed the nipples of their
virginity. . . 8* Neither left she her SEX SINS brou ght from Egypt;
for in her youth they had [SEXUALLY] lain with her, and had handled,
pressed, and squeezed the breasts and nipples of her virginity, and
poured their sex sin upon her. . . 21 And she made the memory of the
loose ways of her early years come back to mind, in the handling and
using of your breasts and nipples by the Egyptians, for the [desire of
your] breasts of your youth.
- - - - with Prov 5 - - - - -
20 [with Strong's references] And why will you, my son, be ravished
<07686> (8799) with an immoral woman estranged [from God and His
people]<02114> (8801), and embrace <02263> (8762) the bosom <02436> of
one who is an alien [to God and His people] <05237>?
- - - - the understanding I have is that embracing, handling, pressing,
using and/or squeezing the breasts of a woman who is not your own woman
maritally - - - whether or not the breats/nipples be clothed or bare -
- - - is sex sin. Cartoons and animations that portray the sex sins
described above should be avoided by disciples of Jesus Christ. "25 . .
. we have sent a letter with our judgment that they should abstain
from . . . sexual immorality.? Acts 21 ESV
12.> Ezek 23 makes it clear that it is sex sin to lay bare, uncover,
and/or expose the pudenda/vulva/labia/vagina/clitoris of a woman who is
not your own marital partner
"18* And she laid bare and made known her sex sins, and laid bare and
made known her pudenda and vagina; and my soul was alienated from her,
like as my soul was alienated from her sister." Cartoons and animations
that portray a woman laying bare and publicly exposing her
pudenda/vagina/labia/anus should be avoided by disciples of Jesus
Christ. "18 Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin a person
commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins
against his own body." 1Cor ESV
13.>The nonJewish Christian might be tempted to use 1 Tim 4:1-4 to
rationalize doing oral sex when single or with a single woman. The
error in that is that it is essential to realize that "fornication,
sexual immorality, sex sin" at the time of Acts 14, before the
nonJewish Christians were released from most of the Sinai Law in Acts
15 and 21:15-26 - - - is the same sin after Acts 15 and 21 for Jewish
Christians. This means nonJews/Gentiles have to carefully observe the
principles given in Rom 14, 1 Cor 8 and 10 in their fellowship with
Jewish Christians who are still observing the Sinai Law. For a proper
understanding of the Word on "fornication, sexual immorality, sex sin"
when the Spirit led the Apostles in Acts 15 and Acts 21:15-26, it has
to be observed that the Spirit did not move the Apostles to change the
definition of "fornication, sexual immorality, sex sin". Just as Jesus
did not change the definition of "fornication, sexual immorality, sex
sin" when He first spoke of "fornication, sexual immorality, sex sin"
in Mat 5:32; 19:9; the Apostles - inspired by the Spirit - in the same
way did not change the definition of "fornication, sexual immorality,
sex sin" when they instructed the nonJewish Christians to avoid
"fornication, sexual immorality, sex sin" in Acts 15 and Acts 21:15-26.
Oral sex and anal sex were sin for Jewish Christians because of the
Sinai Laws of sex and uncleanness that both Jesus and the Apostles
observed (Mat 23:3; Acts 21:24, 25, 26) the same Sinai Laws about
"fornication, sexual immorality, sex sin" that the Spirit imposed on
the nonJewish Christians when they told them to abstain from
"fornication, sexual immorality, sex sin" in Acts 15 and Acts 21:15-26.
Oral sex and anal sex were sin for Jewish Christians during Acts 14,
and they continued to be sin after Acts 15. That at least means that
nonJewish/Gentile Christians must be careful to observe Romans 14; 1
Cor 8 and 1 Cor 10 as to oral and anal sex when relating to Jewish
believers. Romans 14 is the passage that deals with
Oral sex and genital to skin contact involves unholiness, uncleanness.
The sin of uncleanness is the sin of violating holiness,
sanctification, being set apart only for designated actions/functions.
In marriage the wife's body is sexually sanctified, set apart, for her
husband who has sexual authority over it; and the husband's body is
sanctified, set apart, for his wife who has sexual authority over it (1
Cor 7:2-5). Holiness and moral cleanness are really important thing to
God. Heterosexual relations, relating to someone by means of a sex
organ, with someone other than your own marital partner is uncleanness
and is a violation of holiness and sanctification.
END OF PART ONE
